Correct, in Spinoza's eyes substance encompasses all things, therefore substance cannot itself be a…

… whose concept does not require the concept of another thing, from which it must be formed.” (E1D3) Thus for Spinoza, a substance is not any particular thing; it is not a thing at all. “For everyone who has to any extent contemplated the divine nature denies that God is corporea… whose concept does not require the concept of another thing, from which it must be formed.” (E1D3) Thus for Spinoza, a substance is not any particular thing; it is not a thing at all. “For everyone who has to any extent contemplated the divine nature denies that God is corporeal.” …
Heidegger & Spinoza: Ontological Anticipation and Interpretation
58
2
Daniel Lehewych
Nicholas Porter
·Follow
Jan 16, 2023
--
Correct, in Spinoza's eyes substance encompasses all things, therefore substance cannot itself be a thing. More concretely, all finite things are contained by the infinite (substance).
--
--
Written by Nicholas Porter784 Followers
·431 Following
Researcher. Software. Plants.
No responses yet
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams